The Moroccan Empire was founded in 788 A.D. and lasted for nearly 1,200 years. In spite of that, the French established their dominance in Morocco in 1902. In response, the people fought for freedom, independence, and self governance, consequently, the French deposed of the rightful Sultan Mohammed V to replace him with the Sultan Ben Arafa. Mohammed V resisted the imposition of the French people upon the Arabs, whereas Ben Arafa supported the French imposition and would sign agreements impairing the country of Morocco. This developed the Moroccan massacre of over 2,000 French colons, and in retaliation the French army destroyed entire tribes and villages killing over 60,000 Moroccan citizens. Morocco was under French martial law from 1914 to 1955 until it was recognized as a sovereign independent state by the direct intervention of the United Nations (U.N).
Morocco was the first nation to formally recognize the newly independent corporation, United States, opening its docks to American ships by decree of Sultan Mohammad III in 1777. Morocco acknowledged the United States by a signing a treaty of peace and friendship in 1786. Contrary to popular belief of America obtaining its name from Amerigo Vesipucci, the Florentine navigator; the ancient name of America was once recognized as the Al Maghrib Al-Aqsa (i.e. Al Maroc) meaning the "extreme west". Despite this truth, the Moroccan struggle for full independence was epitomized in the nationalist movement founded in 1943, called the Istiqlal. December of 1952, marked a time of riots in Casablanca, Oujda, and other cities causing the French authorities to outlaw Istiqlal, deposing the Sultan Mohammaed V. Sultan Mohammad V was taken to Corsica and later moved to the island of Madagascar on January 25th, 1954. The Istiqlal contended that Morocco had no civil liberties that protected freedom of press, speech, or of assembly; that French authorities deliberately miseducated the Moroccans, and that the French hindered the unionization of Moroccan labour. This led to Sultan Mohammed V to be reinstated and Morocco to gain its independence in 1955. Nevertheless, the Treaty of Peace and Friendship between Morocco and the United States of America has not been implemented and respected appropriately.
We shall create a hell here until we get our independence.
Moroccan Liberation Activist
The Myth of Afrakan Independence
The so called independence of Afraka did not decolonize or restore Afrakan countries and its people from western exploitation. Instead, it created a sophisticated mechanism of exploitation through indirect rule causing Afrakans to become partners in their own oppression. The independence of Afrakan countries brought upon the globalization and indigenization of neo-colonialism. This can be confirmed with the Eurafrica project where colonial powers desired to extract Afraka's resources with an internationalized neo-colonialism that permitted joint exploitation on the continent which is the current European Union (E.U). Peo Hansen and Stefan Jonsson of Linkoping University in Sweden notes,
...the E.U. or European Economic Community (EEC), was from the outset designed, among other things, to enable a rational, co-European colonial management of the Afrakan continent.
The EEC was established in 1957 by the Rome Treaty, which aimed to create a free trade across the continent of Afraka. During this treaty, six European countries agreed to have equal access to trading and investment opportunities in twenty-one Afrakan countries including:
Benin
Burundi
Burkina Faso
Cameroon
Central Africa Republic
Chad
Comoros
Central Africa Republic
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Djibouti
Gabon
Guinea
Ivory Coast
Mali
Mauritania
Niger
Republic of the Congo (Kongo Brazzaville)
Rwanda
Senegal
Somalia
Togo
In 1963, the Eurafrica project extended to the Yaounde Convention signed by EEC members, and 18 former Belgian & French colonies. This caused Afrakan countries to be subjects of the colonial authoritative system. This has impaired the infrastructure of Afrakan countries and the Afrakan people as there is a misconception of identity within the diaspora. This has been done strategically through the existent corruption of western education which influences global indoctrination.
The Unites States of America (U.S.A) has been bankrupt a few times in history starting in 1871 and each time citizens were stripped of rights. According to the Office of the Law Revision Counsel United States Code, the United States is a body corporate for municipal purposes and may contract and be contracted with, sue and be sued, plead and be impleaded, have a seal, and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation not inconsistent with the Constitution and laws of the United States and the provisions of this act- in other words, the United States means a federal corporation, agency or entity. Hence, most public citizens who are Moors of America - erroneously identify themselves as "black", "negro", "nigga", "colored", "African Americans", are ruled under the "Color of Law". The Blacks Law Dictionary 2nd Edition states the color of law means the appearance or semblance, without the substance, of legal right [State v. Brechler, 185 Wis. 599, 202 N.W. 144, 148]. This indicates misuse of power, possessed by virtue of state law and made possible only because wrongdoer is clothed with authority of state is action taken under 'color of law.' Hence, colored or black people technically do not exist and are not recognized by the courts. Thus, "Blacks" and "whites" are considered 14th Amendment citizens or employees.
A Harvard graduate that is Palestinian and Jordanian recognized that North America was once known as Al Maghrib Al-Aqsa and it reported to the Sultan of Morocco. The colonels and governors of Morocco was part of communications with the greater of Morocco. A written law created connects the relationship of Afrakans in America in the Moroccan Treaty of 1787 stating:
Thus an act was passed in Massachusetts on 6th March, 1788, forbidding any Negro not a subject of the emperor of Morocco, or a citizen of the United States, from carrying in the Commonwealth. This recognizes that 'negroes' were identified as Moors and were on the same footing status as citizens. Those who remembered their identity as Moors would use the Moroccan Treaty of 1787 to secure their sovereign rights. Therefore, for those that accepted the identification that was given to them by oppressors would not be protected by the treaty. Our duty lies in the naturalization process of protecting the Moor birthright by first changing concepts within the mind and the political status on record.
Pope Nicholas V issued the papal bull Dum Diversas on 18 June, 1452, which facilitated the Portuguese slave trade in West Afraka, authorizing the eugenics of any “Saracens (Muslims) and pagans and any other unbelievers” to perpetual slavery. A section of the Romanus Pontifex of January 5th, 1455 is as follows:
“We weighing all and singular the premises with due meditation, and noting that since we had formerly by other letters of ours granted among other things free and ample faculty to the aforesaid King Alfonso – to invade, search out, capture, vanquish, and subdue all Saracens and pagans whatsoever, and other enemies of Christ wheresoever placed, and the kingdoms, dukedoms, principalities, dominions, possessions, and all movable and immovable goods whatsoever held and possessed by them and to reduce their persons to perpetual slavery, and to apply and appropriate to himself and his successors the kingdoms, dukedoms, counties, principalities, dominions, possessions, and goods, and to convert them to his and their use and profit – by having secured the said faculty, the said King Alfonso, or, by his authority, the aforesaid infante, justly and lawfully has acquired and possessed, and doth possess, these islands, lands, harbors, and seas, and they do of right belong and pertain to the said King Alfonso and his successors”.The Dum Diversas, the Romanus Pontifex and the Inter Caetera was the foundation for the justification for global slave trade starting in 15th century, imperialism, globalization, and neo-colonialism. In contemporary times, this information has been suppressed by subversives like COINTELPRO to subvert liberation movements. It is the constitutional role of the so called government (govern-mental) to protect the people, however, it is not the role of a corporation to do so, hence, we live by a global caste system where people are categorized by the color of law- this does not pertain to humanity.
The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples states:
Article 6- Every indigenous individual has the right to a nationality.
Article 9- Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right to belong to an indigenous community or nation in accordance with the traditions and customs of the community or nation concerned. No discrimination of any kind may arise from the exercise of such a right.
Article 37- Indigenous peoples have the right to the recognition, observance, and enforcement of treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangement concluded with states or their successors and to have States honour and respect such treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements. Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as diminishing or eliminating the rights of indigenous peoples contained in treaties, agreements and other constructive arrangements. United Nations: Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948
Article 15- Everyone has the right to a nationality. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his/her nationality nor denied the right to change his nationality.
Treaty of Peace and Friendship Tripoli 1796:
Article 11- As the government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen, and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony between the two countries.
Moor was once synonymously used to describe Afrakans, although, Afrakans are a mixture of various ethnic groups. The Almoravid dynasty reached Senegal so some enslaved peopled taken to the Americas were Moors- not to mention the indigenous Moors of the Americas. When the Portuguese first discovered west Afraka, the inhabitants were described as Moors despite them being in the Guinea region. The Fulani prince was described as a Moor even though he is a west Afrakan. This information supports the following statement: Moors are Americans and pilgrims are caucasians.
American: n. an Aboriginal or one of the various copper colored natives found on the American Continent by the Europeans; the original application of the name.
-- Websters 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language and 1939 Websters unabriged 20th century dictionary.In section 6 & 21of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1786 states:
If any Moor shall bring Citizens of the United States or their Effects to His Majesty, the Citizens shall immediately be set at Liberty & the Effects restored & in like Manner, if any Moor not a Subject of these Dominions, shall make Prize of any of the Citizens of America or their Effects, & bring them into any of the Ports of His Majesty, they shall be immediately released as they will then be considered as under His Majesty’s Protection.
If a Citizen of the United States shall kill or wound a Moor, or on the contrary if a Moor shall kill or wound a Citizen of the United States, the Law of the Country shall take place & equal Justice Shall be rendered the Consul assisting at the Trial; & if any Delinquent shall make his escape, the Consul shall not be answerable for him in any Manner whatever—
This treaty was shared with Thomas Barclay, where a translation was made by Isaac Cardoza Nuñez, an interpreter at Morocco, of the Treaty between the Emperor of Morocco and the United States of America.
I saw that the whole situation to this problem lay in political freedom for our people, for is only when a people are politically free that other races can give them the respect that is due to them. It is impossible to talk of equality of races in any other terms. No people without a government of their own can expect to be treated on the same level as a people of independent sovereign states... No race, no people, no nation can exist freely and be respected at home and abroad without political freedom.
~ Dr. Kwame Nkrumah
Know Moor, Be Moor.
ASÉ
